Foundation of Management Organization Functions †Free Samples

Question: How to the Foundation of Management Organization Functions? Answer: Introducation: An organization functions in several environment, it is highly difficult to assess that what factors influence organizational structure (Steinbach et al. 2016). Organizational management consists of set of norms that controls the organizational environment, the employee behavior the relationship between the employee and organizational authority. The motive of the organization is to achieve desired position in the society. In order to achieve the target every organizational management introduce some efficient rule to stimulate the organizational performance. In this competitive era, it has become very important for every business organization to perform in an effective manner to survive in the competition. Many analysts have claimed that business organization must adopt any strategy that will be suitable for the organizational structure and beneficial for the organization to function (Mikes and Kaplan 2013). The following article has discussed on the best way to manage any organizatio n. It has analyzed relevant theories and practices to demonstrate the concept of organizational management. The best way to observe the organizational management style is contingency theory. The contingency theorists have explained the style of organizational management in significant manner. As per the theory, the style of the organizational management and leadership is completely depends on the requirement of the organization to achieve the desired target and put a strong foot print in the industry. Contingency theorists have made the concept of organizational management simple (Clarke 2013). According to contingency theory, there is no universal way to manage any organization. Some analysts claim that, one leadership style which is suitable for particular organization that may not become successful to manage any other organization that operates in a different manner. As opined by Nahavandi (2016), the best way to manage any business organization depends on the internal and external factors of the organization. The organizational management must observe all the factors that influence the organizational operation to establish an efficient organizational strategy. There are number of external factors, such as- financial infrastructure of the country, competitive nature of the market, market demand, government laws and policies, the effect of labor union, technological factors. These factors play crucial role in the development of any business organization. The organizational management must consider these factors while designing their organizational structure. It will be beneficial for the organization to earn the long-term goal. Contingency theory has provided a wide concept about the organizational strategy through which the organization will be managed. Contingency theorists have provided some key ideas about organizational management, such as: There is no one best method to control any business organization successfully. The organizational strategy must be suitable for the organizational environment. It is not enough for the organizational strategy to be fit for the organizational environment; it must be suitable for the organizational sub systems as well. A business organization can flourish while it is properly designed and maintained. Te organizational management must some efficient style to operate the organization which will be beneficial for the employees of the organization. There are many contingency theorists that have designed the theory in several ways. However, there are some analysts that have claimed that the management style of an organization must be based on the organizational structure. As opined by Tom Burns and Graham Stalker (1961), in their book called The Management of Innovation the management style of an organization that operates in stable atmosphere must be different from the organization that functions in the dynamic environment. Thus, there is no any one single way to manage all kind of business organization. According to them the managerial style by which any organization operates is linked with the organizational values and missions. The organizational management must concentrates on the organizational objective and all the external factors that influence the organizational function while constructing any managerial decision. According to the analysts, there are two types of organization mechanistic and organic (McCleskey 2014). Mechanistic organization which is known as bureaucracies, are suitable for stable environment. This type of organization is clearly designed and controlled by the higher authority. The organizational management in this type of organization does not allow the participation of the employees in the organizational decision making process. In this type of organizational management, organizational authority plays the key role in the organizational decision making. They are responsible to design the organizational structure according to their point of view. It is often evident that in mechanistic organization the organizational management they often have any mission or organizational objective. In this type of organizational structure, staff members are bound to follow all the instruction of the organizational authority (Pindek, Kessler and Spector 2017). Organic organization unlike mechanistic organization is suitable for unstable environment. In this type of leadership the organizational authority mainly focuses on the organizational as well as employees performance. The organizational management in this type of organization motivates employees to give their best performance and always appreciate their contributions for the organization. This type of leadership style is mainly based on the relationship between the organizational management and staff members. The organizational management in this type of organizational structure involves their employees in the decision making process of the organization. They encourage their employees and provide a strong platform to share their opinion over and issue. According to the Burns and Stalker each style of organizational management is appropriate under specific circumstances. Analysts have claimed that these two types of leadership style are suitable in different type of environment. Managerial leadership plays significant role in the organizational development (D. Waters 2013). It motivates employees to give their best performance, control the internal environment of the organization, provides healthy and peaceful environment to the employees and maintain healthy and interactive relation between the organizational management and workers. However, it depends on the organizational environment. The contingency theorists claim that none of the leadership style is appropriate in all kind of atmosphere (Frankel and PGCMS 2017). As opined by Fiedler, the quality of the organizational and employee performance is dependent on the leadership quality. In his theory he has concentrated on three contextual factors, such as- environment of the group, structure of the task and power position of the leader. He has enlightened the effect of both the leaders personality and situation on the organizational operation (Fiedler 1964). According to the Fiedler the leadership style puts a significant impact on the performance of the employees. The relation between the leader and employees reflects the leadership style. A leader that maintains healthy and interactive relation with the employees will be accepted as most preferred leaders among the employees. The growth of the organization is highly dependent on the relationship between the leaders and employees. However, the relation of the employees and leaders is dependent on various factors. In large business organization it is not possible for the organizational management to often meet with all the employees and discuss about any issue. It distinguishes the leader employee relation of a small organization from a comparatively large business organization. The structure of the organizational activity also plays a crucial role in the organizational strategy (Vann et al. 2014). Organizational authority designs their organizational structure according to the requirement of the organization. The primary objective of the business organization is to make huge profit by providing quality service. In order to achieve the desired target, the organizational management incorporates some efficient strategies that will be beneficial to stimulate the organizational performance. The style of organizational performance is not same in all organizations. It differentiates the management style of different organization. As per Fiedlers statement, there is no effective or ineffective leadership style. A leadership style that suits in a particular situation may not be effective enough for a different type of situation. According to the theorist the style of leadership depends on the situation in which a leader performs. The organizational structure, employment structure, government rules, labor rules are different in different location. It leads the organizational authority to establish their organizational structure in different manner (Cavarretta et al. 2015). As per the previous discussion, it can be stated that it is difficult to observe the leadership style of any organization without assessing the organizational structure and the organizational environment in which the organization performs, as there are various factors that puts significant impact on the organizational operation, such as- government rules and laws, labor laws, competitiveness of the market, consumers requirements, the size of the organization. These factors influence the growth of every organization. It distinguishes the organizational structures of several organizations. After considering the contingency theory, it can be stated that the effectiveness of the leadership style depends on the situation of the organization. A leadership cannot be appropriate for all kind of organizational environment. Thus, to assess the leadership quality is not possible. The contingency theorists have claimed that there are various internal factors that influence the leadership quality , such as- task structure, employee-leader relation, the size of the organization. In order to observe the appropriate leadership style of any organization one must understand these internal and external factors. Hence, it can be stated that there is no one effective way to manage an organization , it depends on the organizational structure. Reference: Burns, T.E. and Stalker, G.M., 1961. The management of innovation. Cavarretta, F., Hannah, S.T., Piccolo, R.F. and Uhl-Bien, M., 2015. Leadership beyond the Tipping Point: toward the Discovery of Inversions and Complementary Hypotheses. Clarke, S., 2013. Safety leadership: A meta?analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,86(1), pp.22-49. Waters, R., 2013. The role of stewardship in leadership: Applying the contingency theory of leadership to relationship cultivation practices of public relations practitioners.Journal of Communication Management,17(4), pp.324-340. Fiedler, F.E., 1964. A contingency model of leadership effectiveness.Advances in experimental social psychology,1, pp.149-190. Frankel, A. and PGCMS, R., 2017. What leadership styles should senior nurses develop?.benefits,10, p.32. McCleskey, J.A., 2014. Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development.Journal of Business Studies Quarterly,5(4), p.117. Mikes, A. and Kaplan, R.S., 2013. Towards a contingency theory of enterprise risk management. Nahavandi, A., 2016.The Art and Science of Leadership -Global Edition. Pearson. Pindek, S., Kessler, S.R. and Spector, P.E., 2017. A quantitative and qualitative review of what meta-analyses have contributed to our understanding of human resource management.Human Resource Management Review,27(1), pp.26-38. Steinbach, A.L., Holcomb, T.R., Michael Holmes, R., Devers, C.E. and Cannella, A.A., 2016. Top management team incentive heterogeneity, strategic investment behavior, and performance: A contingency theory of incentive alignment.Strategic Management Journal. Vann, B.A., Coleman, A.N. and Simpson, J.A., 2014. Development of the Vannsimpco leadership survey: a delineation of hybrid leadership styles.Swiss Business School Journal of Applied Business Research,3, pp.28-38.